Is arXiv the right place for my paper?

Posting your first paper online is exciting. Before you spend an evening wrestling with upload forms, it is worth asking a simple question: is arXiv actually the right home for this piece of work? This article walks you through what arXiv is, what it expects, and some signs that your paper might belong somewhere else first.

A quick note: ResearchGuild is an independent community and is not affiliated with arXiv. We summarise arXiv's public pages here to help you get oriented, but always check the linked arXiv pages for the current rules.

What arXiv is (and isn't)

According to its About page, arXiv hosts and permanently preserves a free, open-access archive of scholarly articles in specific fields of research. It describes itself as covering eight subject areas, including physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, and electrical engineering and systems science (check the About page for the current list). Anyone can read and download articles, and arXiv says there are no fees for submitting.

Two points matter a lot for first-time authors:

• arXiv is not a journal. arXiv states that material is not peer-reviewedPeer reviewFormal evaluation of a paper by independent experts, usually organised by a journal or conference, before it is accepted for publication. arXiv moderation and endorsement are not peer review. by arXiv, and the contents of a submission are wholly the responsibility of the submitter.
• arXiv is moderated. Submissions go through a moderationModerationarXiv's check of every submission for fit and basic quality before it is announced. It is separate from endorsement and from peer review. process that checks whether the material is topical for the subject area and has scholarly value. Moderators are volunteer subject experts.

So arXiv is a place to share research quickly and openly, but it still has standards. "Anyone can post anything" is not how it works.

What moderators look for

arXiv's moderation pages describe checking that papers are topical, refereeable scientific contributions that follow accepted standards of scholarly communication, as exemplified by conventional journal articles. In practice, a good self-test is:

1. Would this make sense as a submission to a journal or conference in my field? If the honest answer is "not really", arXiv moderators may reach the same conclusion.
2. Does it contain something new? arXiv's content-type policy repeats, for theses and lecture notes alike, that work "should have novel results and be of plausible interest to professional researchers."
3. Is it written for researchers? Blog-style explainers, opinion pieces and course notes covering standard material are generally not a fit.

Content types that need extra care

Some kinds of writing are handled with specific policies. Read the linked arXiv page for the full list, but here are the ones students most often ask about:

Theses

arXiv says a thesis can be appropriate if it has novel results and plausible interest to professional researchers, and that undergraduate or master's level researchers should consult their advisor before submitting.

Lecture notes

Per arXiv, lecture notes that are pedagogical or that cover standard material should not be submitted. Some fields develop lecture notes around novel research in a research-article format, and those may be acceptable.

Review articles and position papers in computer science

This is the big one for many new authors. As of October 2025, per arXiv, review (survey) articles and position papersPosition paperA paper that argues for a viewpoint or direction for a field rather than reporting new results. Like surveys, arXiv's CS section only accepts these after peer review elsewhere. submitted to the CS categoryCategory (subject class)arXiv's topic label for a paper, such as cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence) or cs.CL (Computation and Language). Moderators and readers use it to route and find papers. must already have been accepted at a journal or conference and have completed successful peer review, with documentation included. Without it, arXiv says they are likely to be rejected. We cover this in detail in Research paper vs survey vs position paper.

Comments on other papers

arXiv accepts "comments-on" papers in some cases, but notes that with rare exceptions they are only accepted in response to works that have appeared on arXiv.

Other things to have in place

Even if your paper is a good fit, you will need a few practical things:

• An endorsementEndorsementA statement, made on arXiv's own form by an established arXiv author, that you are someone who can reasonably contribute to a subject area. It is not peer review and doesn't guarantee acceptance., most likely. arXiv requires users to be endorsed before submitting their first paper or submitting to a new category. The rules changed in January 2026; see What is arXiv endorsement?.
• A full English version. As of February 2026, per arXiv, submissions need a full English-language version. See English-language requirement.
• Files arXiv can process. See TeX or PDF?.
• Co-author agreement. Everyone on the author list should be happy for the work to become public, because arXiv describes articles as a permanent part of the scholarly record.
• Journal policy check. If you also plan to submit to a journal, arXiv suggests checking the journal's and funder's preprintPreprintA complete research paper shared publicly before, or independently of, peer review in a journal or conference. policies before posting.

When arXiv might not be the right first step

Consider waiting, or choosing a different venue, if:

• the work is an early idea without results yet;
• it is a survey or position paper in CS that has not been through peer review;
• it is class coursework or a tutorial on well-known material;
• your co-authors or advisor have not agreed to share it.

None of these mean your work isn't valuable. They just mean arXiv's moderators are likely to see it as outside what arXiv is for.

A practical next step

If you think your paper is a fit, try our readiness check and then read about choosing your primary category. When you are ready for feedback from experienced researchers, you can start a paper on ResearchGuild.