The single category that best fits a paper's main contribution. It decides which endorsement you need and where the paper is announced.
Read: Choosing your primary category (cs.AI vs cs.LG vs cs.CL and friends)
The words you'll meet before your first preprint, in plain English. Across the site, a dotted orange underline means a word is defined here; hover or tap it to see the definition. For arXiv's exact rules, follow the article links, which cite arXiv's own pages.
A free, open-access repository where researchers share papers publicly, usually before or alongside formal publication. It is not a peer-reviewed journal.
A complete research paper shared publicly before, or independently of, peer review in a journal or conference.
Formal evaluation of a paper by independent experts, usually organised by a journal or conference, before it is accepted for publication. arXiv moderation and endorsement are not peer review.
Read: Research paper vs survey vs position paper — and the CS peer-review rule
Digital Object Identifier: a permanent ID for a published work, such as 10.1145/1234567. A DOI can serve as proof that a paper was published after peer review.
Read: Research paper vs survey vs position paper — and the CS peer-review rule
A short summary of a paper: the problem, what you did and what you found. On ResearchGuild, only the abstract is shown until you choose who reads the full paper.
A paper that reports new work: new methods, experiments, results, data or proofs.
Read: Research paper vs survey vs position paper — and the CS peer-review rule
A paper that summarises and organises existing work on a topic rather than reporting new results. arXiv's CS section only accepts these after they have passed peer review elsewhere.
Read: Research paper vs survey vs position paper — and the CS peer-review rule
A paper that argues for a viewpoint or direction for a field rather than reporting new results. Like surveys, arXiv's CS section only accepts these after peer review elsewhere.
Read: Research paper vs survey vs position paper — and the CS peer-review rule
arXiv's topic label for a paper, such as cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence) or cs.CL (Computation and Language). Moderators and readers use it to route and find papers.
Read: Choosing your primary category (cs.AI vs cs.LG vs cs.CL and friends)
The single category that best fits a paper's main contribution. It decides which endorsement you need and where the paper is announced.
Read: Choosing your primary category (cs.AI vs cs.LG vs cs.CL and friends)
Also listing a paper in secondary categories so readers in related fields can find it. Use it only when the paper is genuinely relevant there.
A ResearchGuild tag inside a category, such as “Agents & planning” in cs.AI. Authors tag papers with 1–3 sub-topics and endorsers follow the ones they know, which drives matching. arXiv doesn't use these.
A typesetting system widely used for scientific papers. arXiv accepts TeX/LaTeX source as well as PDFs; the linked article explains which to use.
The permission you choose when submitting, which says how others may reuse your paper (for example, a Creative Commons license). arXiv treats each version's license as irrevocable.
A statement, made on arXiv's own form by an established arXiv author, that you are someone who can reasonably contribute to a subject area. It is not peer review and doesn't guarantee acceptance.
An arXiv author who is eligible to endorse in a subject area, which depends on their own recent papers there. On ResearchGuild, endorsers are volunteers who opt in to read abstracts.
A short code arXiv gives you when it asks for an endorsement. An endorser enters it on arXiv's form to endorse you. Here it stays hidden until a reviewer has opened your full paper.
A group of related arXiv subject areas that share one endorsement. Being endorsed in one domain doesn't automatically cover another.
The option on arXiv's endorsement form for an endorser who decides not to vouch for someone. It counts as a real vote, so declines here should also be recorded there.
arXiv's page that lists which authors of a given paper can endorse. Endorsers on ResearchGuild link one as evidence of eligibility.
arXiv's check of every submission for fit and basic quality before it is announced. It is separate from endorsement and from peer review.
Read: After you submit: on hold, reclassification and moderation
A submission status meaning arXiv moderators are taking a closer look before announcing the paper.
Read: After you submit: on hold, reclassification and moderation
When arXiv moderators move a paper to a different primary category than the one the author chose.
Read: After you submit: on hold, reclassification and moderation
The permanent identifier arXiv assigns when a paper is announced, such as 2409.12345. Adding it here lets us verify the posting.
Uploading an updated version of an announced paper. Earlier versions stay available, labelled v1, v2 and so on.
Marking an announced arXiv paper as withdrawn. It adds a new version with your reason, and earlier versions remain accessible, so withdrawal isn't deletion.
Seven questions you must pass before posting an abstract here: paper type, a complete English version, a finished draft, category, own work, endorsement code, and a promise not to mass-ask.
Your complete manuscript as a PDF. It is private: only you, your co-authors and the reviewers you share it with can open it, and it's deleted 30 days after the paper closes.
On ResearchGuild, an endorser who has accepted your abstract and received your full paper. Up to 3 can hold a paper at once.
A first-come queue for reviewers when a paper already has the maximum number of active reviewers, or a reviewer is at their own capacity. People move in automatically when a slot frees.
One turn of reviewer comments followed by the author's reply or new version. Rounds happen in in-app threads; there are no private messages.
Your self-declared eligibility to endorse in one category, with an evidence link. It shows as “claimed” until a paper you endorse here is verified as posted in that category, then “confirmed”.
An in-app note an author can send to a matching endorser. It is limited to 3 per paper per week so nobody is mass-asked.
Points that make helping newcomers visible. Endorsing and declining earn the same. Karma has no monetary value and can't be transferred.
An endorser's history here: confirmed endorsements, how many were verified as posted on arXiv, and how helpful authors found their feedback.
A promise, made after someone vouches for you, to review for others once you are eligible. We remind you 3 months after your paper is posted.
A free, persistent identifier for researchers, like 0000-0002-1825-0097, that links you to your work. Optional here.
A free, open catalogue of scholarly works and authors. We use it to list your past papers when you pick your author record.
Google's search engine for academic papers. Researcher profiles there list papers and citations. We show your link but can't read it automatically.
Glossary text is licensed CC BY 4.0. Spotted something unclear or out of date? Open an issue on GitHub.